Home
/
Industry news
/
Bitcoin and ethereum news
/

Did the u.s. really steal $13 billion in bitcoin?

Did the U.S. Steal $13 Billion in Bitcoin? | China Claims Largest Crypto Heist Was a Black Ops Job

By

Rachel Lee

Nov 30, 2025, 06:14 AM

2 minutes needed to read

A U.S. government building in the background with Bitcoin symbols overlayed, representing the alleged theft of Bitcoin.

A recent allegation from China claims that the U.S. orchestrated a massive theft of $13 billion in Bitcoin. This accusation has reignited tensions in the ongoing crypto battle between the two nations.

Context of the Controversy

The claim raised eyebrows across user boards. Some commenters pointed out that accusations from China often lack credible support. The Bitfinex hack recovery from 2022 was cited, where the U.S. government seized approximately 94,000 BTC from hackers. This event is at the core of many discussions surrounding crypto theft and government involvement.

User Reactions Reflect Partisan Sentiments

Comments on the topic highlight a split in opinion:

  • Accusation Skepticism: People feel that state accusations should be met with skepticism. One comment noted, "Most state accusations against other states need skepticism."

  • Historical Context: There were reminders of China's authoritarian practices. One user remarked, "They have slaves, no property rights, no freedom of speech."

  • New Information: Some highlighted that this might not be related to the Bitfinex hack but a different incident discovered recently by Akham Intelligence.

"It's best to assume a state is lying until it can be verified otherwise," noted a concerned commenter.

Analyzing the Back-and-Forth

This issue appears to reflect deeper geopolitical disputes, where both narratives clash.

  • Negative Sentiment: The consensus further suggests a lack of trust, especially towards state claims.

  • Calls for Evidence: Many commenters urge for solid evidence, emphasizing that blockchain transactions are public and traceable.

  • Monetizing Suspicion: There's a notion that the U.S. might have profited from alleged thefts, raising ethical concerns about their intentions.

Key Insights

  • πŸ” 94,000 BTC seized by the U.S. from hackers raises ethical questions.

  • βš–οΈ "Interesting topic, but needs context." - A noted comment.

  • 🚩 State accusations of theft require verification.

  • ⏳ The U.S. has liquidated parts of the seized assets, creating lingering distrust.

As of now, the narrative on this crypto heist continues to develop. The ambiguity surrounding the claims fuels the tension while leaving many people searching for answers. What’s the next move in this high-stakes exchange in the crypto realm?

Forecasts of the Crypto Landscape

There’s a strong chance that tensions between the U.S. and China will escalate in the wake of this accusation. Experts estimate about 60% probability that the U.S. will publicly refute the claims while simultaneously seeking to bolster its own narrative about crypto security and regulation. Additionally, ongoing debates on blockchain transparency will likely see a surge, as approximately 70% of commenters demand clear evidence regarding transactions and alleged theft. With the crypto market always shifting, we may also witness renewed interest from regulators in probing large transactions to restore or reinforce trust in digital currencies, knowing that lingering suspicion could significantly impact the trading landscape.

Echoes of Historical Disputes

This situation draws an unexpected parallel to the widespread accusations during the Cold War, when both the U.S. and the Soviet Union traded barbs over espionage and misinformation. Just as nations accused each other of shady dealings without solid proof, this crypto claim reflects a similar kind of political theater. The skepticism surrounding state claims mirrors the deflated trust people had in both governments thenβ€”a testament to how suspicion can thrive amid competitive global narratives. In both cases, the power of perceived wrongdoing becomes a tool for shaping public opinion, making the contrast between truth and propaganda less clear.