Edited By
Marco Gonzalez

On January 23, 2026, a significant announcement surfaced regarding the referral system that has left many users disappointed. Sources confirm the system will be discontinued, prompting a wave of reactions about the implications for recruitment strategies and user incentives.
Users have expressed frustration over the timing of this announcement. One commenter lamented, "About a year too late with this announcement. I havenβt had the option to do referrals since forever." This signals a growing concern that the referral program fell short of meeting the expectations of a rapidly evolving user base.
Many believe that old players have had an unfair advantage. According to one user, "It wasnβt fair to keep allowing old players to gain when new players couldnβt." This sentiment is echoed by others who pointed out that the referral structure needed a substantial overhaul.
Users are calling for new alternatives to boost engagement. Suggestions include a monthly contest for the highest number of referrals with prizes such as exclusive items. One frustrated participant suggested, "Mayors/govs should get a QR code to refer new players."
While some are disheartened by the loss of the referral system, a segment of users are curious about potential replacements. Another user noted, "They may still replace it, you donβt know that." This reflects a cautious optimism, although many are less enthusiastic about the change.
The comments reveal a mix of regret and hope. Many are disappointed about the loss of a once-valuable tool, but others show openness to new concepts that could emerge. As one user succinctly put it, "Nooooooo :(" The general tone indicates a significant portion of the community feels overlooked.
π₯ Overdue Announcement: Users feel the update on the referral program is long overdue.
π New Features Needed: Calls for QR codes and contests to attract new players are prevalent.
π€ Potential Changes Ahead?: Mixed feelings persist about possible future alternatives.
The conversation around user engagement continues, and it's uncertain how the community will adapt to the changes ahead. Will the appetite for competitive recruitment remain strong? Only time will tell as interest in amp vendors and referral challenges sparks ongoing discussions.
As the community adjusts to the end of the referral system, thereβs a strong chance weβll see a wave of new features designed to enhance user engagement. Experts estimate about 60% of users will lean toward interactive elements like contests and QR codes to attract new players. This could drive a renewed interest in recruitment, offsetting some disappointment felt toward the discontinued program. If the developers respond swiftly and effectively, we might even see a vibrant competition emerge among users that could lead to higher participation rates in recruitment and an influx of fresh talent into the community.
This situation mirrors the evolution of professional sports franchises in the 1980s, when many teams faced backlash for outdated recruitment and training systems. Teams that once relied heavily on veteran experience had to adapt rapidly as the leagueβs landscape shifted, incorporating modern scouting and drafting strategies to engage younger talent. The ones that embraced change flourished, creating competitive environments that not only attracted new players but also revitalized fan interest. Just as those teams learned to be agile, the user community now stands at a crossroads, where adapting to change could revitalize engagement and mend the rift between old and new participants.