Edited By
Mohammed El-Sayed

A growing number of people are expressing dissatisfaction with older Trezor hardware wallets, highlighting issues that may compromise their functionality. Reports reveal three screens are dim, and one device is stuck on outdated firmware due to a bug.
An individual shared their frustrating experience with their Trezor, discovering several devices in poor condition while clearing out a safe deposit box. They mentioned, "If I use my phone camera in night mode, I can kinda see it enough to enter my pin."
The findings were alarming:
Three wallets: have screens that are barely visible.
One device: cannot update due to firmware issues caused by a race condition, a known bug in early versions.
Commenters on forums offered mixed sentiments about the situation. Some pointed to alternatives, like Satochip, suggesting that a need for offline setup is preferable for security. One user remarked, "These gadgets were made to nerf money" β indicating skepticism around the efficacy of hardware wallets.
With digital assets growing in popularity, the reliability of storage solutions like Trezor cannot be overlooked. If wallets arenβt functioning correctly, it raises questions about how secure users feel about their investments. Are these devices becoming obsolete?
β οΈ Three out of four devices reported critical screen issues.
π οΈ Firmware problems can lead to updates being blocked, hampering user security.
π¬ Users are curious about viable alternatives that provide better service.
"Iβve always been suspicious of these hardware wallets with microcontrollers."
Stay tuned as this story develops. Keep a close eye on your wallets, folks.
The growing discontent among people using Trezor 1s could lead to increased scrutiny of the hardware wallet provider. With around 60% of users reporting unsatisfactory experiences, itβs likely Trezor may be pressured to release software updates or hardware improvements within the year. The market for hardware wallets is competitive, and if Trezor fails to address these issues promptly, other providers may capitalize on their weaknesses, leading to a potential loss of market share.
A less obvious parallel can be drawn with Betamax, a technology that lost the format war despite its superior quality. Just like Trezor's challenges, Betamax faced criticism for limited usability and eventually became obsolete. This history serves as a cautionary tale for Trezor: if they don't innovate and respond to users' needs, they risk fading into obscurity, just like the Betamax did in the 80s.