Home
/
Expert opinions
/
Thought leadership
/

Has vc funding killed the true spirit of cypherpunks?

A growing coalition of people in the crypto scene argues that venture capital funding has overshadowed the core principles of the cypherpunk movement. The community is facing conflict as new comments highlight a staffing shift from innovation to a profit-driven focus, sparking a debate on the movement’s original goals.

By

Aisha Patel

Jan 25, 2026, 08:22 PM

Updated

Jan 26, 2026, 01:10 AM

2 minutes needed to read

A group of diverse individuals discussing technology and privacy, surrounded by digital symbols representing crypto and venture capital. A nostalgic vibe hints at a previous era of rebellion.

The Cypherpunk Ethos Revisited

Reflecting on the influential 1993 piece "Crypto Rebels," it’s clear that today’s crypto landscape starkly deviates from the movement's roots. Once a gathering of cryptographers dedicated to privacy, the cypherpunk movement now wrestles with external influences prioritizing profit. Strong comments from the community echo this sentiment:

  • "Cypherpunks don’t care if you don’t like the software they write."

  • "When normies invade your space, it’s time to pack your bags and get out."

This shift has led to many lamenting a significant loss of the original ideals, replaced by monetary motivations.

The Current Crypto Climate

In 2026, the crypto community feels disheartened.

Phil Zimmermann, a key figure in this movement, previously described releasing code as "like thousands of dandelion seeds blowing in the wind"β€”symbolizing freedom in innovation. Yet, many argue that the essence of innovation is lost amid a frenzy of financial speculation and exit strategies.

"We've traded a tool for liberation for a high-stakes casino," remarked one commentator, mirroring widespread frustration.

Key Themes Emerging from Discussions

  1. Greed Trumps Ideals: Many participants note that venture capital’s influence has pushed profitable gains ahead of ensuring privacy and decentralization.

  2. Voices Being Supressed: There are frustrations over cypherpunks feeling marginalized, with current conversations dominated by monetary interests.

  3. Desire for Original Purpose: A nostalgia echoes through the community, with calls to return to the movement's founding principles.

Community Sentiment

The community's frustration is palpable:

  • One person stated, "The enshitification of crypto is a natural consequence of human greed."

  • Another expressed a longing to reclaim the "mathematical fortress" era of cypherpunks, emphasizing a loss in technological innovation.

Key Insights

  • ⚑ Shift to Profit-Driven Models: The crypto industry’s current focus on financial returns risks overshadowing foundational values.

  • πŸ“‰ Core Values Erode: Concerns mount that the cypherpunk spirit is fading in the face of wealth-driven projects.

  • πŸ—£οΈ Community Voices: Many express the need for a restoration of original ideals to steer the industry back to its roots.

As dialogue heats up, a pressing question underlines discussions: Will the movement manage to recover its original mission, or further fragment into profit-focused factions? The situation appears to parallel past tech booms, suggesting the potential for new grassroots efforts to restore focus on privacy and empowerment amid an unpredictable landscape.

What’s Next for Crypto and Cypherpunks?

The friction between profit motives and the core ideals of cypherpunks will likely shape the future of cryptocurrency. As more people voice dissatisfaction, there's a growing chance of grassroots powers revitalizing the movement towards privacy-focused solutions. This could either lead to the birth of innovative technologies emphasizing user empowerment or exacerbating the split into profit-driven entities.