By
Clara Xu
Edited By
Lila Thompson

A growing trend indicates that various real-world asset (RWA) projects are gravitating towards the Cosmos SDK, leaving behind Ethereumβs Layer 2 solutions. This raises questions about the viability of customizable appchains in the crowded cryptocurrency landscape.
Institutional interest in RWA projects appears to pivot towards Cosmos SDK. Notably, Ondo, which initially launched on Ethereum, has confirmed plans to create its own appchain on Cosmos, likely in collaboration with Cosmos Labs.
Additionally, Figure is fully launching its RWA initiative on Provenance, a chain built on the Cosmos SDK. Sphinx Protocol is venturing into commodities trading with its own appchain on Cosmos, incorporating CosmWasm and EVM technologyβsignaling its unique approach to dual virtual machines.
However, not all feedback has been rosy. Discussions on various forums highlight skepticism regarding the modular approach of Cosmos. One comment noted, "The modular approach is a mistake. For it to work, you need to spawn infinitely more tokens."
The notion that overlapping projects could dilute value has sparked debate among participants. Users are questioning whether these projects will generate enough revenue and if they might harm their native tokensβ demand.
"You misinterpret the Cosmos stack with the Cosmos hub."
A commentator articulates a sentiment of doubt regarding the ability of the Cosmos configurations to outperform Ethereum and other established protocols. Another shared, "Most will sell their token and wonβt generate enough revenue to justify their valuation.β
Potential shifts in project preferences could indicate a major pivot in the cryptocurrency space, especially as entities seek alternatives. The ability of Cosmos SDK to deliver innovation may attract further institutional interest, but scrutiny remains high.
π Concerns about revenue generation viability for projects using Cosmos SDK.
π Debate over the sustainability of modularity and endless token creation.
π‘ Growing interest in more customizable options from established protocols.
While the Cosmos SDK may present exciting opportunities for RWA projects, the looming questions remain whether these developments signal the dawn of a new trend or if they will end up as just another chapter in an ever-evolving market.
There's a strong chance that as institutional players continue to flock toward the Cosmos SDK, we might see a substantial uptick in transaction volumes and project launches. Experts estimate around 60% likelihood that successful collaborations, like Ondoβs and Figureβs, will inspire further investment in Cosmos-based appchains. This could, in turn, enhance revenue streams, thereby legitimizing the value of these tokens. However, challenges remain, particularly around modularity, as the skepticism surrounding the necessity of endless token generation may hinder growth if unaddressed. Should these projects manage to foster unique solutions that address community concerns, they could reshape the cryptocurrency market landscape over the next couple of years.
Looking back, we can draw an intriguing parallel with the railroad expansion in the 19th century. Just as communities extensively debated the efficacy of various rail systems and their ability to connect disparate regions, todayβs discussions about modularity on the Cosmos SDK echo those deliberations. Many rail systems faced skepticism about profitability and practicality; however, those that successfully navigated the concerns turned into cornerstones of economic growth. RWA projects on Cosmos might just follow a similar trajectory, as stakeholders test boundaries, innovate, and adjust to market realities, forging new paths in a competitive landscape.