Home
/
Community engagement
/
Forums and discussions
/

9th checklist point after second migration explained

Mainnet Checklist Update | Questions Arise After Second Migration

By

Alice Thompson

Apr 25, 2026, 04:24 PM

Edited By

Alice Turner

2 minutes needed to read

Graphic showing the 9th point of the mainnet checklist with migration themes

A growing number of people are inquiring about the latest checklist for the mainnet after the recent second migration. Comments reveal inconsistencies and uncertainties affecting the community's confidence.

Context of the Migration

After the second migration, individuals expected updates to the checklist. However, discussions suggest that the 9th point may not have changed much, with many commenting that "total number of coins changed" is the only notable difference. This has sparked confusion among people trying to track their assets post-migration.

User Concerns and Confusion

People are wrestling with several key uncertainties regarding the migration process:

  • Wallet Tracking: One question looms large: "What if someone set a second wallet for the second migration? Are both wallets visible, or just the latest one?" This reveals concern over the clarity of wallet management.

  • Consistency of Information: Repeated comments such as "It remains the same" hint at potential communication issues from the development team, suggesting updates may not be as transparent as needed.

  • Moderation Responses: A moderator's announcement was mentioned, yet it lacked substance, leaving many wanting a clearer direction.

"What about a case where someone set a second wallet for a second migration?" - A concerned user's comment illustrates the ongoing questions surrounding wallet management.

The tension among people creates an underlying sense of urgency as they seek reliable answers amid mixed signals.

Key Highlights

  • 🚩 Most comments indicate that only the total number of coins changed.

  • πŸ“‰ Users remain unsure about how multiple wallets are displayed post-migration.

  • πŸ” A moderator's vague announcement left many wanting more concrete details.

It's a pivotal moment for the community as they navigate this transitional phase. The questions surrounding wallet visibility and reliable updates could impact trust in future migrations. Interestingly, how will the development team address these emerging concerns, and ensure clarity moving forward?

What Lies Ahead for the Crypto Community

There’s a strong chance that the development team will address the confusion by providing clearer updates on wallet visibility and migration details. As more people voice their concerns, a shift toward enhanced communication appears probable. Experts estimate around a 65% likelihood that the team will implement an FAQ section on their platform, clarifying the status of multiple wallets. When trust hangs in the balance, transparency is crucial. If issues persist, the community's confidence might dwindle, leading to further scrutiny of future migrations. Thus, proactive measures in communication and support could stabilize this transitional phase.

A Unique Historical Parallel

Looking back to the Californian Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, miners faced similar dilemmas when it came to tracking claims. Amidst the rush, many rushed to locate their properties only to discover outdated maps and unclear boundaries caused confusion and disputes. Just as those miners sought clarity and confidence in their claims, today’s crypto enthusiasts are navigating a murky landscape with their assets post-migration. The lack of clear communication can drive a wedge between the miners then and the people now, making it imperative that clarity is restored quickly to prevent a modern-day collapse in trust.