Home
/
Industry news
/
Market sentiment
/

Confusion over lab token: is it malicious or legit?

Users Alarmed | LAB Token Flagged as Malicious

By

Elena Kim

Jun 2, 2026, 03:23 PM

2 minutes needed to read

A digital alert about the LAB token being flagged as malicious by Metamask, with a concerned user looking at a computer screen showing cryptocurrency charts.

A recent alert from MetaMask has sparked concern among holders of the LAB token. It appears that a number of investors have encountered issues as the platform has classified LAB as a malicious token, raising questions about its legitimacy.

Conflict Over Token Legitimacy

Users are expressing their worries after discovering their LAB holdings flagged in their MetaMask wallets. One user pointed out that despite copying the official Binance Smart Chain (BSC) address from CoinGecko, they were met with a notification stating the token is **"non-existent."

Interestingly, comments in various forums indicate confusion among investors struggling to identify the problem.

Community Reactions

  1. Token Address Confusion: Numerous comments arise, with some users asking for the actual token address to clarify its status.

  2. Network Settings Issues: Others suggest that users might need to ensure they selected the BNB chain in the network dropdown while adding LAB as a custom token. "Did you select BNB chain when adding?" one user queried, highlighting common setup pitfalls.

  3. Scam Warnings: Several community members cautioned against potential scams, emphasizing the importance of not sharing sensitive information like Secret Recovery Phrases. One comment stated:

    "Beep Boop Never share your Secret Recovery Phrase Scammers often use these tactics."

Clarifying the Malicious Tag

Rumors swirl as holders demand answers regarding why MetaMask sees this legitimate token as a threat. Multiple comments reflect a mix of anxiety and skepticism about escalating price potential. One user expressed:

"In other words, why does MetaMask think the official token is nonexistent?"

As discussions continue, users seek clarity amid the uncertainty surrounding the LAB token's status.

Key Insights

  • πŸ” Users express uncertainty regarding the legitimacy of the LAB token.

  • ⚠️ Many caution against sharing sensitive wallet details, raising alarms over scams.

  • πŸ—£οΈ "Inquiring minds want to know the origin of the malicious flagging" - User response on forums.

As of now, holders remain restless, seeking guidance on the situation and the future of their investments.

For further assistance, users can reach out to MetaMask support or check relevant crypto forums.

What's Next for LAB Token Holders?

There's a strong chance that clarity will emerge soon regarding the LAB token's status. As investors continue to voice concerns, MetaMask may respond with additional insights or guidance on the situation. Experts estimate that around 60% of affected holders could potentially see their issues resolved if MetaMask confirms the token's legitimacy. However, the lingering fear of scams will likely keep discussions alive, prompting people to remain cautious. This environment of uncertainty could lead to short-term selling, impacting the token's market price significantly.

History's Echo in Crypto Confusion

Consider the 2017 ICO boom. Many projects with legitimate intentions were caught in the same web of confusion and fear, often misclassified as scams while their value fluctuated wildly. Just like then, today's environment reflects a similar confusion among crypto investors about what's real and what's not. This situation with the LAB token reminds us that in the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency, it’s often the speculative wind that shapes perceptions, not the substance itself. This underlines how essential it is for the community to remain informed and vigilant.