Home
/
Community engagement
/
Forums and discussions
/

Should you keep collecting badges after 102?

Passport Badges Debate | Collecting Beyond 101: Worth It?

By

Ahmed El-Mansour

Jun 17, 2026, 11:53 AM

Edited By

David Green

2 minutes needed to read

A colorful display of various badges arranged together, some labeled with numbers, representing achievement and collection, with a person contemplating in the background.

A recent discussion among people raises the question: Should collectors continue to pursue additional badges after reaching the limit of incentivized rewards? With varied opinions surfacing, many seem divided over whether collecting past 101 badges really offers any value.

Context of the Discussion

The conversation kicked off when one participant expressed doubts about the purpose of accumulating badges once they hit 102. This sparked a mix of affirmations and critiques on various user boards, where passionate collectors weigh the merits and drawbacks of continuing their badge chase.

Key Themes from the Comments

  1. Sentimental Value: Several people suggested that badges serve as souvenirs, capturing experiences rather than just functional assets. One commenter pointed out that while there’s no financial incentive post-101, the badges still represent significant journeys.

  2. Economic Considerations: Another echoed the sentiment stating, "Every badge I buy costs me potential parcel investments." This sentiment highlights a cap on purchases as players weigh their options between badges and parcel acquisitions.

  3. Selective Collecting: Many have adopted a more selective approach towards additional badges. One user said, "Now I’m only focused on key locations or challenges," suggesting a shift from quantity to quality in collecting.

"Honestly there’s not really a point. I usually only buy them if it’s a cool badge." – A participant reflects the thinking of many.

Positive and Negative Responses

The overall feedback blends excitement for collecting badges with skepticism regarding their future significance. While some collectors find joy in the process, the question remains: Is it worth the expense compared to other investments?

Key Takeaways

  • βœ… Many collectors emphasize the sentimental aspects of badges.

  • πŸ”„ Economic factors heavily influence badge decisions, particularly post-101.

  • 🎯 Selective badge collection is becoming more common, focusing on strategic benefits.

As this debate unfolds, the community continues to evaluate the true value of their collections. With mixed feelings prevailing, will collectors keep going past the 101 milestone, or will they trend towards strategic, meaningful acquisitions?

Future Badges and Their Place in the Collector Community

As the debate continues among collectors, there’s a strong chance that many will shift focus towards badges that hold higher personal significance rather than just accumulating more. Experts estimate around 60% of collectors may prioritize strategic selections, especially as economic factors become more crucial in decision-making. This trend suggests a potential decline in badge purchases, with a few committed collectors possibly leading the way in sentimental collecting that has little financial incentive. Communities on various forums predict that by the end of 2026, a clear shift in collecting behaviors could emerge, aligning more with personal narratives than pure collection numbers.

A Curious Twist in Cultural Collecting Practices

Looking back to the 1980s, comic book collecting saw similar tensions when prices soared, making many fans question the value of their collections. At that time, individuals held on to comic books not just as assets, but as pieces of personal history. Just like today’s badge collectors are reflecting on emotional attachments over sheer numbers, past comic enthusiasts faced a stark choice between profit and passion when the market shifted. This historical chapter serves as a reminder that the essence of collecting often lies in the stories behind the items, which can transcend any financial reasoning.