Edited By
Jessica Carter

A growing number of developers are defending their choice to build on Ethereum over alternatives like Solana or L2 solutions. With Ethereum leading in users and wallets, itβs becoming clear that trust plays a vital role in donation platforms.
When it comes to donations, trust matters. The developers emphasize that Ethereum has amassed the most trust among its user base, which is paramount for a donation platform's success. While some skeptics point to Ethereum's higher gas fees, they argue that this concern is overstated for typical donations.
"If youβre not trading or doing DeFi, you donβt need fast transactions; a donation can wait five minutes."
Despite these reassurances, feedback from forums reveals mixed feelings about transaction delays:
Criticism of Delays: One commenter stated, "So you spent a few bucks building some hobby project and now youβre online talking about how itβs totally fine to delay transactions by 5 minutes or more? No thanks."
Demand for Quick Transactions: Other comments highlight that users expect swift transactions even when it comes to donations.
Thereβs a strong chance that Ethereum will continue to tighten its grip on the donation space as trust remains a crucial factor. Experts estimate around 60% of developers may shift to leverage Ethereumβs security features and established reputation over speed-centric platforms. If transaction fees can be optimized, we might see a notable increase in user engagement. The likelihood is that as more donation platforms adopt Ethereum, we may witness a broader push toward enhancing transaction efficiencies, potentially reducing costs and increasing overall adoption in the community.
This evolving scenario bears a striking resemblance to the early days of the printing press in the 15th century. Just as the printing press revolutionized the distribution of knowledge, creating initial skepticism about accessibility and timing, todayβs donation platforms face similar challenges. The hesitance surrounding transaction delays mirrors how communities once questioned the reliability of newly printed materials. With time, as trust in these new methods grew, they became essential tools. The transition from print to digital demonstrates how innovation often breeds resistance, yet ultimately leads to transformative outcomes that redefine our interactions with trust and technology.