Home
/
Industry news
/
Innovation in blockchain
/

Can developers really just build on l1? insights ahead

Is Building on Layer 1 a Viable Option? | Users Weigh In

By

Maria Gonzalez

Jul 14, 2026, 09:17 AM

2 minutes needed to read

Developers working on a computer with blockchain graphics, analyzing gas fees and L1 options.

A lively discussion is heating up among crypto enthusiasts on whether developers should focus on Layer 1 projects. Many are curious about the current gas prices compared to the notorious $200 fees of the past. A recent comment sparked conversations around the efficiency improvements in Ethereum's infrastructure.

Context: The Shift in Gas Fees

Back in the day, users faced astronomical fees of $200 for basic transactions on the Ethereum network. However, recent developments suggest a better scenario. As one commentator noted, "The capacity has grown, and become a lot more efficient." Today's gas fees hover around $0.5 for transactions, a significant drop from earlier years.

Community Insights

Commenters have shared mixed sentiments about the current state of Layer 1 transactions:

  • Community Growth: Many believe Ethereum's mainnet is once again a viable option for serious projects, considering the reduced costs and improved capacity.

  • Cost Comparisons: Users report that mainnet transfers can now cost similarly to Layer 2 transfers, essential for developers eager for affordability in their projects.

  • Future Developments: Innovations like Glamsterdam’s approach to tripling block sizes could lead to even lower transaction costs, further solidifying Layer 1's place in the ecosystem.

Quote from Comment: "In short, mainnet is back in town and is fun and affordable again."

What's Driving the Conversation?

This discussion raises a pertinent question: Can Layer 1 really rebound to its former glory without the pain of high fees? The community seems to believe so, with a positive outlook on Layer 1's potential as it becomes increasingly affordable.

Key Points to Note

  • πŸ“‰ Gas fees have reduced significantly since the peak of $200.

  • πŸ”„ Mainnet transfers are now comparable in cost to Layer 2 transactions.

  • πŸš€ Innovations proposed could further decrease transaction costs.

As developers continue to navigate these changes, the conversation around building on Layer 1 will likely continue to evolve, especially in light of community optimism and innovative advancements within the network.

A Forward-Looking Perspective

Looking ahead, there's a strong chance that developers will increasingly embrace Layer 1 platforms as transaction costs continue to stabilize and resources become more accessible. With current gas fees around $0.5, experts estimate a potential growth in Layer 1 projects by as much as 30% over the next year. This optimism is largely fueled by innovations like Glamsterdam’s proposed changes for block size. If these advancements come to fruition, they might further lower costs and attract more serious projects back to the mainnet. As developers adapt to these conditions, it’s likely we’ll see a blend of Mainnet and Layer 2 strategies, each playing a critical role depending on the requirements of individual projects.

Lessons from the Dot-Com Boom

An interesting parallel can be drawn to the late 1990s dot-com boom. Just as optimistic tech startups faced tremendous uncertainty, today’s crypto developers are navigating a rapidly changing environment. There were moments when internet-based companies soared in popularity, only to crash when costs proved unsustainable, similar to what we saw with Ethereum fees in the past. Yet, the aftermath provided valuable lessons, leading to more resilient business models and innovations. Today’s crypto landscape echoes that vibrancy, as the community braces for a renaissance built on newfound efficiencies that could very well shape its future identity.