
Arthur Hayes, the former CEO of BitMEX, has issued a stark warning about Monad, a new layer-1 blockchain project. Hayes claims it could plummet by as much as 99%, citing its high Fully Diluted Value (FDV) and low circulating supply as key factors threatening retail investors. In a recent forum discussion, he described Monad as a venture capital-driven "VC coin" with limited long-term viability.
Hayes's comments come amid a growing concern in the crypto community over the sustainability of new blockchain initiatives. He notes that most layer-1 networks are likely to fail, with only a fewβlike Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solanaβexpected to endure. He stated, "Most new layer-1 networks will not survive."
Monad recently raised $225 million from Paradigm and launched its MON token via an airdrop, which has triggered mixed reactions online.
In the bustling user boards, reactions range from skepticism to support of Hayesβs assertions:
A commenter remarked, "Shitcoins can crash? π€"
Others lamented, "Rich coming from him, but I do agree MON is garbage."
Some pushed back, suggesting Hayes may be looking to buy in at cheaper prices due to his past actions.
Many in the forums pointed to current market trends, calling out the volatility of coins like Monad. A user boldly stated, "Only the ones you buy are pumping." Meanwhile, others noted Hayesβs past behavior: "For supposedly such a rich man, why the grift?"
π 99% crash risk: Hayes argues the design flaws make Monad perilous for retail investors.
π Promise of new coins: Despite warnings, some are optimistic about potential short-term gains, noting, "Time to go all in."
π΅ Venture capital influence: Hayes highlights that investor-backed coins often lack true market sustainability.
The chatter around Hayes's commentary reflects significant uncertainty in the crypto space. While some believe his old-school skepticism might hold weight, others contend he's simply trying to manipulate market dynamics.
Could this criticism lead to irreversible damage for Monad, or will it thrive despite these warnings? Only time will tell.
As the debate over Monad unfolds, there's a strong chance volatility will define its immediate future. Experts estimate around a 70% probability that the project will face a steep decline, influenced by the criticisms put forth by figures like Hayes. Retail investors may become increasingly wary, leading to an exodus of funds. Conversely, a small faction, approximately 30%, could buy the dip, hoping to capitalize on short-term gains if the market swings positively. The growing scrutiny on venture capital-backed coins like Monad raises questions about their long-term sustainability, further amplifying these risks.
In many ways, the situation surrounding Monad mirrors the speculative frenzy seen during the Tulip Mania of the 17th century. Just as tulip prices soared on speculative hopes, the current hype around new cryptocurrencies often stems from investor enthusiasm rather than genuine utility. Both scenarios display how enthusiasm can inflate perceived value before a harsh correction reveals true worth. Similarly, many investors today might find themselves looking back at their choices, pondering, like the tulip traders of old, if they chased a fleeting trend, ignoring signs of an impending crash.